Filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomised MISTRAL-C trial
Selected in EuroIntervention by S. Brugaletta
Van Mieghem NM, van Gils L, Ahmad H, van Kesteren F, van der Werf HW, Brueren G, Storm M, Lenzen M, Daemen J, van den Heuvel AF, Tonino P, Baan J, Koudstaal PJ, Schipper ME, van der Lugt A, de Jaegere PP
EuroIntervention. 2016 Jul 20;12(4):499-507
LinkRead the abstract
Latest contributionsPropensity-matched comparison of percutaneous and surgical cut-down approaches in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a ball... Pulsatile iVAC 2L circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the p...
What is known
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is less invasive and results in faster recovery and improvement in quality of life as compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, major stroke is still a vexing complication associated with aortic valve replacement, with recent studies suggesting similar stroke rates with SAVR and TAVI, varying between 2 and 10%. Approximately half of all strokes within 30 days after TAVI occur in the first 24 hours and are thus directly related to the procedure. TAVI inevitably releases debris from the aortic wall, the aortic annulus and even from cardiac structures, and catheter-related foreign body particles.
The SentinelTM Cerebral Protection System (CPS) (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) provides filter protection to the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery. The safety and efficacy of the device were demonstrated and the device obtained CE mark in January 2014. The aim of this study was to determine whether use of the Sentinel CPS during TAVI can decrease the incidence of new brain lesions as assessed by DW-MRI, and can prevent neurocognitive decline.
- From January 2013 to July 2015, 65 patients were randomised 1:1 to transfemoral TAVI with or without the Sentinel CPS.
- Patients underwent DW-MRI and extensive neurological examination, including neurocognitive testing one day before and five to seven days after TAVI.
- Follow-up DW-MRI and neurocognitive testing was completed in 57% and 80%, respectively.
- New brain lesions were found in 78% of patients with follow-up MRI. Patients with the Sentinel CPS had numerically fewer new lesions and a smaller total lesion volume (95 mm3 [IQR 10-257] vs. 197 mm3 [95-525]).
- Neurocognitive deterioration was present in 4% of patients with Sentinel CPS vs. 27% of patients without (p=0.017).
- The filters captured debris in all patients with Sentinel CPS protection
In TAVI procedure, the rate of ischemic stroke is somehow underestimated. However, it is a real and actual problem, which is of importance especially looking forward to treat an intermediate risk population with TAVI. For this reason, the use of embolic protection devices should be highlighted and should be known to the interventional cardiologists who perform TAVI. The present article, despite limitations due to its small statistical power, shows the efficacy and safety of a new embolic protection device. It is still to be investigated which is the most useful, safe and easiest embolic protection device to use in TAVI procedure.
Do you use such devices in your TAVI practice?