Impact of stent overlap on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents
Selected in EuroIntervention by S. Brugaletta
O’Sullivan, C Stefanini, GG Räber, L Heg, D Taniwaki, M Kalesan, B Pilgrim, T Zanchin, T Moschovitis, A Büllesfeld, L Khattab, A Meier B, Wenaweser P, Jüni P, Windecker S
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jan 22;9(9):1076-84
Early-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) overlap (OL) is associated with impaired long-term clinical outcomes whereas the impact of OL with newer-generation DES is unknown. Our aim was to assess the impact of OL on long-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with newer-generation DES.
Methods and results
We analysed the three-year clinical outcomes of 3,133 patients included in a prospective DES registry according to stent type (sirolimus-eluting stents [SES; N=1,532] versus everolimus-eluting stents [EES; N=1,601]), and the presence or absence of OL. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularisation (TVR). The primary endpoint was more common in patients with OL (25.1%) than in those with multiple DES without OL (20.8%, adj HR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.03-2.09) and patients with a single DES (18.8%, adj HR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.34-2.25, p<0.001) at three years. A stratified analysis by stent type showed a higher risk of the primary outcome in SES with OL (28.7%) compared to other SES groups (without OL: 22.6%, p=0.04; single DES: 17.6%, p<0.001), but not between EES with OL (22.3%) and other EES groups (without OL: 18.5%, p=0.30; single DES: 20.4%, p=0.20).
DES overlap is associated with impaired clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Compared with SES, EES provide similar clinical outcomes irrespective of DES overlap status.
Latest contributionsPCR @ ESC Congress 2017 COOL AMI EU pilot trial: a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial to assess cooling as an adjunctive therapy to percutaneous interve... At least seven days delayed stenting using minimalist immediate mechanical intervention (MIMI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the S...
What is known
Stent overlap occurs in up to 30% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary clinical practice for a variety of reasons including excessive target lesion length, incomplete lesion coverage, edge dissections and residual thrombus. In the largest study to date addressing long-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with the unrestricted use of early-generation overlapping DES, patients with DES overlap had a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven TLR) and impaired angiographic results as compared with non-overlapping or single DES control groups. As compared with early-generation devices, newer-generation DES, such as the everolimus-eluting stent (EES), have improved upon the safety and efficacy profile of early-generation devices. However, the impact of newer-generation DES on long-term clinical outcomes among patients with DES overlap is unknown. The authors sought herein to compare the long-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with newer (i.e., EES) and earlier-generation DES overlap (i.e., SES) with non-overlapping DES controls stratified according to stent type.
- At three years, the primary outcome (composite of death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation) was more common in patients with overlap than in those with multiple DES without overlap (adjusted HR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03 – 2.09) and patients with a single DES (adjusted HR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.34 – 2.25)
- A stratified analysis by stent type showed a higher risk of primary outcome in SES with overlap compared to other SES groups, but not between EES with overlap and other EES group.
This paper describes a large cohort of patients with overlap DES, finding that DES overlap is associated with impaired clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Of note is that compared with SESs, EESs conversely provide similar clinical outcomes irrespective of DES overlap status. Given the fact that DES overlap is frequent in clinical practise (up to 30%), the findings of the present paper are of importance and represent another point in favour of new-generation drug-eluting stents, together with other data recently published on overlap. It would be interesting to know whether this new generation DES improvement in overlapping is also present in STEMI patients, where the thrombotic milieu can provoke higher rate of malapposed struts than stable plaques.