EuroIntervention PCRonline - Connecting with the community

Just accepted article

Instantaneous wave-free ratio to guide coronary revascularization: physiological framework, validation and differences with fractional flow reserve

Disclaimer:

As a public service to our readership, this article - peer reviewed by the Editors of EuroIntervention - has been published immediately upon acceptance as it was received. The content of this article is the sole responsibility of the authors, and not that of the journal or its publishers. To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Sign in to download the full article

1. NETHERLANDS; 2. NIHR Cardiovascular BRU, Royal Brompton Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; 3. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States; 4. Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; 5. VU University Medical Center, Cardiology, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS

Abstract

Determining the optimal treatment strategy for revascularization of coronary artery stenosis involves the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR). To improve the low clinical uptake of physiological lesion assessment to guide revascularization, the instantaneous wave-free period (iFR) was proposed as a simpler alternative to FFR that does not require adenosine administration. iFR is calculated as the ratio of blood pressure distal and proximal to a coronary artery stenosis during the diastolic wave-free period. The wave-free period is a part of the cardiac cycle where generation of…

– OR –