Reliability and application of angio-based physiology in daily work

Session comprising selected EuroPCR 2026 abstract submissions

Moderators: S. Ceni, S. Nijjer

Speakers: K. Sadowski, N. Odanovic, Z. Sun, D. Oikonomou, R. Gál, P. Suwannasom

Summary

This session evaluates the reliability and clinical application of angiography-based physiological assessments in daily practice. Topics include comparisons of angiography-derived microvascular resistance and flow metrics with invasive methods, reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and its correlation with symptom burden and other imaging modalities.

Presentations available when logged in:

Angiography-based µFR for coronary flow and microvascular resistance vs. invasive doppler
High reproducibility of QFR with a newer software version: the QREPeat study
Reproducibility of online vs. offline QFR and long-term results: post-hoc analysis of FAVOR III China
Quantitative flow ratio in predicting residual angina: is it better than the eye?
Quantitative flow ratio in real-world practice: comparison with FFR and learning curve
Discordance between µFR and stress CMR in non-culprit lesions after STEMI

Your free My PCR account will enable you to:

Become a PCR Companion
Access slide presentations from PCR Courses
Watch session videos and LIVE cases
Discuss cases with your peers
Submit and register for PCR Courses
Register for and view PCR Webinars
Read a selection of articles in EuroIntervention
And more…

Reliability and application of angio-based physiology in daily work

Session comprising selected EuroPCR 2026 abstract submissions

Log in or create account for free