PCR Journal Club

The TICO1 and T-PASS2 trials evaluated abbreviated DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy compared to DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Both trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of abbreviated DAPT however, the optimal timing of aspirin discontinuation remains uncertain. This post hoc analysis compares the...

The TUXEDO-2 trial sought to directly compare prasugrel versus ticagrelor in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with the aim of clarifying whether the non-inferiority of ticagrelor could be established.

The present analysis compared major adverse cardiac events in patients with significant coronary stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.80 or visual stenosis ≥ 90 %) versus those with non-significant stenosis (FFR > 0.80).

In patients with severely calcified coronary lesions undergoing PCI, the BALI trial evaluated the benefit of the addition of intravascular lithotripsy to conventional lesion preparation on the composite endpoint of procedural failure and target vessel failure.

In the overall population (n = 2,114), there was a significant interaction between the effect of randomisation to OCT guidance vs angiography guidance in lesions with moderate/severe calcification (n = 1,082) vs no/mild calcification (n = 1,032) on the 2-year rate of TVF (Pinteraction = 0.01).

This analysis from the XIENCE Short DAPT programme compared the safety and efficacy of one-month versus three-month DAPT in high-bleeding risk patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) following PCI with everolimus eluting stents (EES).

This prespecified analysis of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME 3) trial examined the impact on cardiovascular outcomes of treatment by CABG versus FFR-guided PCI in patients with three vessel disease (3-VD), stratified by acute (NSTEMI) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) presentation.

This exploratory analysis from the MASTER DAPT trial evaluates the effect of abbreviated versus prolonged DAPT on total ischaemic and bleeding events in high-bleeding-risk patients from the MASTER DAPT trial.

Due to a lack of randomised evidence, this randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of IVL and ELCA with RA in treating heavily calcified coronary lesions before drug-eluting stent implantation.

This single-arm, double-blinded, core-laboratory adjudicated, prospective trial, conducted across four European centers between August 2019 and April 2022, investigates whether CCTA and FFR-CT are able to exclude hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses in patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS.